SCF-830: Added state management for cluster hibernation - #17
Open
adshin21 wants to merge 19 commits into
Open
Conversation
Coverage Report for CI Build 30528655073Warning No base build found for commit Coverage: 44.986%Details
Uncovered Changes
Coverage RegressionsRequires a base build to compare against. How to fix this → Coverage Stats
💛 - Coveralls |
serdardalgic
requested changes
Jun 22, 2026
serdardalgic
left a comment
serdardalgic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some minor issues @adshin21. After that, I would like to review it again.
…sist lifecycle spec changes in Sync
serdardalgic
requested changes
Jul 16, 2026
serdardalgic
left a comment
serdardalgic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So, some stuff that caught my attention, here it is.
Replace the four-line flag-juggling (isWakingUpSimple / hasPreviousInstances / needsRestore) with a wantsStopped flag plus three self-documenting guards. This removes the latent bug where the inner isWakingUp check was being dropped (Stopped + phase=stopped incorrectly returned WakeUp).
…enum Introduce LifecyclePhase string type with LifecyclePhaseStopped constant and Phase.Stopped() helper; the CRD enum accepts "" or "stopped" via +kubebuilder:validation:Enum="";stopped. Tighten blockLifecycleUpdate error message and cluster_manifest.md wake-up text to mention setting lifecycle.phase to an empty string. Generate DeepCopy for PostgresStatus.PreviousPoolerInstances and use it in Postgresql.DeepCopyInto so the operator's in-memory cache does not share map state with the cluster object.
Tighten the second wake-up guard in detectLifecycleTransition to require PreviousNumberOfInstances > 0. Without a stored replica count, transitioning to Updating with 0 replicas leaves the cluster stuck indefinitely: the sync defer skips Running when oldSpec had 0 instances, and the next periodic Sync sees the same dead-end state. The "Stopped + cleared + no previous instances" test case is renamed and updated to expect LifecycleActionNone, since the previous behavior was a recovery attempt on a corrupted state that produced a worse outcome than the cluster staying in Stopped. Update initiateWakeUp's doc comment to note that the PreviousNumberOfInstances == 0 branch is now unreachable in practice (detect refuses the transition upstream).
* Rewrite the misleading comment in syncStateLocked's defer. The old
wording claimed oldSpec.Spec.NumberOfInstances == 0 during wake-up
because initiateWakeUp hadn't run yet; the real reason is that
c.Postgresql was already hibernated when the reconcile started.
* Skip 0-replica entries in scalePoolerDown's stored map. A pooler
already at 0 has nothing to restore on wake-up; storing it produced
a spurious no-op patch on the way up. Update the corresponding test
case to expect nil instead of {"master": 0}.
* Document the PreviousNumberOfInstances == 0 limitation in
cluster_manifest.md: the operator will not transition out of
Stopped if the field is missing (e.g. due to a partial write or a
manual edit); the user must edit spec.numberOfInstances to wake
the cluster up manually.
…dates Fix bug encountered in e2e tests: user annotations (e.g. last-major-upgrade-failure) were silently dropped when a watch event arrived mid-lifecycle, causing the v16->v18 major version upgrade to proceed despite the failure annotation.
adshin21
force-pushed
the
scalefield_v18-SCF-830-cluster-hibernation
branch
from
July 18, 2026 16:15
7f48801 to
c378463
Compare
serdardalgic
requested changes
Jul 23, 2026
…for pod-termination waits Rename blockLifecycleUpdate to shouldBlockLifecycleUpdate (function, test, callers, comments); the method is a predicate, not a blocking action. In waitStatefulsetPodsGone, use PodTerminateGracePeriod as the retry budget instead of the generic ResourceCheckTimeout. Also drop the unused LifecycleActionStoppingCompleted enum value and trim stray blank lines in resources.go.
serdardalgic
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2026
serdardalgic
left a comment
serdardalgic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ACK 👍 Thanks for your work @adshin21
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.