Skip to content

NO-ISSUE: switch default CI registry to quay-proxy.ci.openshift.org - #1933

Open
andfasano wants to merge 3 commits into
openshift-metal3:masterfrom
andfasano:fix-write-pull-secret
Open

NO-ISSUE: switch default CI registry to quay-proxy.ci.openshift.org#1933
andfasano wants to merge 3 commits into
openshift-metal3:masterfrom
andfasano:fix-write-pull-secret

Conversation

@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As per the latest CI change described here https://docs.ci.openshift.org/how-tos/use-registries-in-build-farm/#container-image-data-flows, the CI default registry is now quay-proxy.ci.openshift.org

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from derekhiggins and tdomnesc July 23, 2026 10:04
@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold

Fine tuning the non-CI access as per the latest CI docs recommendations

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 23, 2026
@andfasano
andfasano force-pushed the fix-write-pull-secret branch from f7e6631 to 4030051 Compare July 23, 2026 10:40
@andfasano
andfasano force-pushed the fix-write-pull-secret branch from 4030051 to a21bbb1 Compare July 23, 2026 11:23
@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 23, 2026
@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

When I test this locally I don't see theregistries.ci.openshift.org creds in pull-secret getting updated to the latest.

@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold

With this patch the registries.ci.openshift.org does not get update in the pull-secret anymore, because the CI doc explicitly mentioned to not use it. So probably we should remove any reference to it?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 23, 2026
@bfournie

bfournie commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold

With this patch the registries.ci.openshift.org does not get update in the pull-secret anymore, because the CI doc explicitly mentioned to not use it. So probably we should remove any reference to it?

In get_latest_ci_image() it does
if curl -L "https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/api/v1/releasestream/${OPENSHIFT_RELEASE_STREAM}.0-0.${OPENSHIFT_RELEASE_TYPE}/latest"| grep -o 'registry.ci.openshift.org[^"]\+'; then

but there is only a registry.ci. pull-spec, not one for quay-proxy at https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/api/v1/releasestream/5.0.0-0.nightly/latest

 {                                                                                                                                                                          
    "pullSpec": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release-5:5.0.0-0.nightly-2026-07-21-234123"                                                                                  
  }    

So recommend adding the quay-proxy url instead of replacing registry.ci.openshift.org similar to https://github.com/openshift-metal3/dev-scripts/compare/65de2b30af827b8a5271722d276ae80dc385c620..e6cd719f0675227a509719b0e9fd11599b4708bf#diff-35a54395325de0227bbdd613dbf61c3265b5f6ab205cf32348e3538399cf1b9eL1029-L1034

@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cc @elfosardo

Let's wait for a more detailed feedback from ART about the URL management, since potentially we may need to update all the reference to registry.ci.openshift.org (apart the references in the Dockerfiles due the custom builds)

@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Meanwhile, this new version keeps updating the pull-secret with both (registry.ci.openshift.org and quay-proxy.ci.openshift.org

@bfournie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve
Tested this and it looks good.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bfournie

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 28, 2026
@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 30, 2026
@andfasano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cc @elfosardo @tdomnesc

@tdomnesc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv4

1 similar comment
@tdomnesc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv4

@elfosardo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@andfasano: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv4 9df26fc link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv4

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants