fix: Security upgrade brace-expansion from 5.0.5 to 5.0.7

[dependabot]

Bumps brace-expansion from 5.0.5 to 5.0.7.

Commits

• b735ba6 5.0.7
• c7e33ec Merge commit from fork
• fa1786a Bump tar from 7.5.11 to 7.5.16 (#116)
• c16f1ec fix(package.json): use git+https instead of git+ssh for repository URL (#115)
• 196bbcc Bump ip-address from 10.1.0 to 10.2.0 (#104)
• eb18dd6 Update ci.yml (#107)
• a39928d Bump minimatch (#106)
• 7950ae3 ci: correct test workflow (#105)
• 46317b5 5.0.6
• c0b095b Merge commit from fork
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated a dependency to a newer patch version, including its lockfile metadata.

[parse-github-assistant]

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

• Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
• Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
• Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
• We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
• Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
• Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

[mtrezza]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6dcdf5c6-d99d-404f-b9f3-659f450b8c19

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f416c89 and 022ebdb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package-lock.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The lockfile updates both brace-expansion entries from version 5.0.5 to 5.0.7 and refreshes their resolved URLs and integrity checksums.

Changes

Dependency lockfile update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update brace-expansion lockfile metadata package-lock.json	The installed and root brace-expansion entries now reference version 5.0.7 with matching tarball URLs and integrity checksums.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers: mtrezza

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch dependabot/npm_and_yarn/brace-expansion-5.0.7

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}